Crawlability
We inspect robots rules, response statuses, redirect chains, internal links, and access to primary content.
We organise the technical signals that allow search engines to discover, understand, and index the correct pages without unnecessary duplicates.
We inspect robots rules, response statuses, redirect chains, internal links, and access to primary content.
Indexable routes, sitemap, canonical, and noindex logic are compared to prevent missing important pages or indexing helper documents.
WWW, HTTPS, trailing slash, language versions, and parameterized URLs are consolidated into clear canonical variants.
We verify reciprocal hreflang relationships and prevent alternates that point to content that does not exist.
Organization, Service, Article, BreadcrumbList, FAQPage, and CreativeWork markup is validated against visible content.
Services, articles, and case studies are connected by topic and intent without orphan pages.
We inspect technical factors that affect crawling, rendering, and user experience.
The service is delivered as part of a wider system connecting brand, content, technology, search visibility, and maintainability.
Indexing, sitemap, and URL inspection reports are diagnostic signals, not substitutes for inspecting the website itself.
Pages use clear types, identifiers, and real relationships between the organization, services, and content.
A technically valid page still needs a clear topic, unique purpose, and useful content.
Scope depends on the current state, number of pages, connected systems, risk, and required depth. We do not use a fictional package price for work that requires proper diagnosis.
scoped individually
We establish the current state, goals, constraints, ownership, and measurable outcome.
We define the information, technical, and operational relationships required by the scope.
We apply controlled changes in the appropriate content, code, platform, and delivery layers.
We repeat build, crawl, device, and production checks before considering the work complete.
We start with the current state, intended outcome, available access, constraints, and the evidence needed to define a responsible scope.
No. Technology and infrastructure are selected according to the project, existing environment, maintenance model, and client requirements.
Yes. The work can begin with an existing platform and does not require a redesign unless the evidence shows that structural change is necessary.
No. We improve technical access, clarity, consistency, and evidence. Search engines and generative systems retain control over rankings, presentation, and source selection.
Own brand and web system built as a working example of the approach.
View case studyVisual system and materials prepared for real communication use.
View case studyStructured identity and usable files for a digital environment.
View case studyWeb design, development, technical SEO, GEO, performance, and support work as a connected system.
Web design by d . media for corporate websites, portfolios, and landing pages with clear architecture, UX logic, and brand consistency.
View specialismWeb development by d . media for fast, accessible, maintainable websites with the appropriate stack, integrations, and performance-first architecture.
View specialismGEO by d . media for clearer entity understanding, AI citation readiness, content architecture, structured data, and consistent public signals.
View specialismPerformance optimization by d . media for LCP, CLS, INP, images, fonts, JavaScript, caching, and stable mobile behaviour.
View specialismTechnical support by d . media for updates, monitoring, content changes, integrations, incident response, and controlled releases.
View specialismSend the domain, platform, and available Search Console signals.